Legal Opinion · Dissent

County of Butte v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 2009No. C057152Published

1Dissent

MORRISON, J.,* Dissenting.

I would grant the writ. The fourth amended complaint fails to state a cause of action, and therefore, to avoid a needless trial, the demurrer should have been sustained.

I adhere to the views expressed in People v. Bianco (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 748 [113 Cal.Rptr.2d 392], and in my concurrence in People v. Tilehkooh (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 1433, 1447-1448 [7 Cal.Rptr.3d 226] (Tilehkooh), that the United States Congress should reconsider its refusal to amend the federal drug laws to make reasonable accommodation for the 13 states that have enacted some form of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API