Legal Opinion

Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 2004No. S119897PublishedCited by 234 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

Government Code section 65590, subdivision (d) (section 65590(d)), part of the Mello Act, provides that “[n]ew housing developments constructed within the coastal zone” shall provide housing for those with low or moderate income where feasible. We must decide whether this provision applies to a proposed project that is partly within the coastal zone but has no housing impacts within that zone. Because the purpose of the Mello Act is to provide for affordable housing based on housing impacts within the coastal zone, we conclude that section 65590(d) does not govern this project.

I…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Torres v. Parkhouse Tire Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Venice Town Council, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Citizens for Hatton Canyon v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

3Cited by234 opinions

  1. People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Jones v. Lodge at Torrey Pines PartnershipCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Bruns v. E-Commerce Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
  5. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

229 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API