Legal Opinion

Neilson v. City of California City

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 2005No. F046860PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAWSON, J.

A nonresident landowner challenged a flat-rate parcel tax imposed by a city after the city’s registered voters approved the tax by a two-thirds majority. The superior court sustained the city’s general demurrer to the landowner’s complaint, which alleged the parcel tax violated limitations on the taxation of real property contained in the California Constitution and violated the constitutional guarantee of equal protection.

The issues raised on appeal are (1) whether taxes based on the mere ownership of real property are constitutionally required to be ad valorem taxes; (2)…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Mendoza v. Rast Produce Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT v. EmerichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. SC MANUFACTURED HOMES, INC. v. LiebertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. City of San Diego v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Villery v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API