Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Brookside Investments, Ltd. v. City of El Monte

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 2016No. B267081PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, P. J.

In 1990 the City of El Monte enacted by initiative an ordinance that prohibited the El Monte City Council (City Council) from passing any form of mobilehome park rent control. In 2012 the City Council sponsored a successful ballot measure to repeal that ordinance and then in 2013 enacted ordinance No. 2829, the Mobilehome Space Rent Stabilization Ordinance, a program of rent control for mobilehome parks with more than 100 mobilehome park spaces.

Brookside Investments, Ltd. (Brookside), which owns and operates Brookside Mobile Country Club, a large mobilehome park, sued the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McCorkle Eastside Neighborhood Grp. v. City of St. Helena, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. BontaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. City and County of SF v. All Persons Interested etc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. City of Fresno v. Fresno Building Healthy CommunitiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. City of Fresno v. Fresno Building Healthy CommunitiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API