Legal Opinion

Puccetti v. Girola

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1944No. Civ. 12590PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This action was filed by plaintiff Alberto Puccetti, now deceased, who was the purchaser of certain real property upon an execution sale. Said sale had been held as the result of an action in which plaintiff Alberto Puccetti had recovered a judgment against defendants Giróla Bros., a corporation, and Henry Giróla, which judgment was based upon the fraudulent sale by defendants Giróla Bros, and Henry Giróla to plaintiff of stock in a subsidiary cor p oration. Plaintiff sought in the present action to quiet his title to the real property so purchased, to have certain deeds thereto from…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hager v. ShindlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Lotts v. Board of Park CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. McMillan v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Rossen v. VillanuevaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Strangman v. DukeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Heffernan v. Bennett & ArmourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Patterson v. MisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Knapp v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Burrows v. JorgensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API