Hager v. Shindler
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judieial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Shafter, J.
The complaint in this action alleges that the plaintiff is the owner of a certain lot in the City and County of San Francisco, under and by virtue of a Sheriff’s deed executed to- him as the purchaser of said lot at an execution sale on the 10th day of December, 1856. That the execution issued upon a judgment in his favor against the defendant, James Shindler, and one Leonard,, rendered February 2d, 1856. That at the time of the sale the lot was, and for several years had been, the property of James Shindler. That pending the action in which the plaintiff’s judgment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- De Witt v. HaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
- Kinder v. MacyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Shattuck v. CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
- De Mattos v. City of New WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Harris v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
- First National Bank of Los Angeles v. MaxwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Chalmers v. SheehyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.