Legal Opinion

Lotts v. Board of Park Commissioners

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 1936No. Civ. 10371PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court declaring that petitioners are entitled to a peremptory writ of mandate ordering their reinstatement to full-time positions in the department of parks of the city of Los Angeles, upon full pay; and further directing the said city to draw warrants in favor of petitioners for the difference in wages between those paid and those appurtenant to full-time employment.

The record discloses that on June 26, 1931, the council of the city of Los Angeles passed Ordinance No. 69872, providing for the creation of half-time positions…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Wood v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Spring Valley Water Works v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Lewis v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Duke v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Mass v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Kacsur v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API