Rossen v. Villanueva
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The plaintiff, Rossen, and the defendant, Villanueva, had been partners in the bottling business at San Bernardino. On April 4, 1913, the plaintiff sold his one-half interest in the property and business of the partnership to the defendants, Seward and Owens, who thereafter, together with Villanueva, conducted the business under the name of Ranier Bottling Company. During the existence of the partnership between plaintiff and Villanueva the plaintiff had contributed a larger amount to the capital of the business than had Villanueva, and plaintiff had a claim against said Villanueva for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Sewell v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Thornburgh v. HandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Jenner v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Burke v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Lowe v. CopelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Adams v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Liuzza v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Neumeyer v. Crown Funding Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.