Legal Opinion

McMillan v. O'Brien

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1934No. Docket No. S.F. 14820PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Action to quiet title. The suit was instituted by plaintiff to quiet title to a narrow strip of real property located on the north side of Geary Street between Kearny Street and Grant Avenue in San Francisco, having a frontage of inches on Geary Street and a depth of 122 feet 6 inches. Defendant’s answer contained the usual formal denials, and in addition contained a second count in the alternative which is the real basis of the controversy of the parties. This count alleges that defendant and defendant’s predecessors in ipterest have paid taxes which were duly assessed to them by the county…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Young v. BlakemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Homestead Company v. Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Title Guarantee Trust Co. v. . HavenNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Stanley v. WestoverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hollywood, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. Stein v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Western Pac. R. Corp. v. Western Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  5. Southern California Gas Co. v. ABC Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API