Legal Opinion
Strangman v. Duke
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1956No. Civ. 21442PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Walter J. Strangman, judgment creditor, appeals from an order directing respondent’s homestead to be sold. On December 2, 1952, Strangman recovered judgment against George L. Duke for $10,000, plus interest and costs; it was based upon an obligation created in February 1947, at which, time the homestead exemption was $6,000. The judgment did not run against the wife, Esther H. Duke. The spouses owned a certain duplex property in undivided interests ; one-half was vested in the wife as her separate property and one-half was held as joint tenancy estate of the two spouses. At least, that was…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- First National Bank of Los Angeles v. MaxwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Yager v. YagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Rauer's Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Cunha v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Swan v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Neel v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
- Schoenfeld v. NorbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- In the Matter of Cecilia May Paderewski (Bankrupt). C. J. Paderewski, and v. John H. Barrett, Oscar F. Irwin, and Lewis H. Silverberg, Co-Trustees AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- In Re GintherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,913, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1912, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2470 in Re Robert John Arrol, Debtor. Robert John Arrol, Debtor-Appellee v. William H. Broach, Trustee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.