Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Alcorn

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 2002No. SB-01-0075-DPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

¶ 1 We took review of this bar disciplinary matter for two reasons: first, to clarify ethical obligations of lawyers who make agreements that may affect the conduct of a trial; and second, to review the disciplinary proceedings and assess the propriety and proportionality of the sanctions imposed on the lawyers involved in this unusual disciplinary case.

¶ 2 Because this matter affects the practice of law and the conduct of Arizona lawyers, we have appellate and revisory jurisdiction pursuant to article VI, §§ 1, 3, 5(4), and 5(5) of the Arizona Constitution, together…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Damron v. SledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PaynterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  3. In Re ShannonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. City of Tucson v. GallagherArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. KrasnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. In Re PeasleyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In the Matter of Rachel R. AlexanderArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Sandretto v. Payson Healthcare Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. In Re Non-Member of State Bar, Van DoxArizona Supreme Court · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API