Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Paynter

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 10, 1979No. 1 CA-CIV 3820PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHROEDER, Presiding Judge.

This is an action by the appellees, Ted Paynter and Ada Paynter, against State Farm Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), Appellant, to recover under a judgment previously obtained by Ted Paynter against an insured of State Farm.

The previous judgment was obtained after State Farm refused to defend its insured. The insured admitted liability pursuant to an agreement in which Paynter agreed not to execute against the insured, in exchange for an assignment of the insured’s rights in the State Farm insurance policy. In this action, the trial court entered…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Damron v. SledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Critz v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Brenner v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. Mannheimer Bros. v. Kansas Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Griggs v. BertramSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Rummel v. Lexington InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API