State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Paynter
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Presiding Judge.
This is an action by the appellees, Ted Paynter and Ada Paynter, against State Farm Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), Appellant, to recover under a judgment previously obtained by Ted Paynter against an insured of State Farm.
The previous judgment was obtained after State Farm refused to defend its insured. The insured admitted liability pursuant to an agreement in which Paynter agreed not to execute against the insured, in exchange for an assignment of the insured’s rights in the State Farm insurance policy. In this action, the trial court entered…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Damron v. SledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Critz v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Brenner v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Mannheimer Bros. v. Kansas Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Griggs v. BertramSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Rummel v. Lexington InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.