Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Rachel R. Alexander
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 2013No. SB-12-0039-APPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Justice.
¶ 1 This case presents our first opportunity to issue an opinion on the propriety of findings made and discipline imposed by a hearing panel under our new attorney-discipline procedures. We accept the panel’s determination that Rachel R. Alexander violated Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct (“ERs”) 1.1, 1.7(a)(1), 3.1, and 8.4(d) and former Arizona Supreme Court Rule 53(d) and (f). 1 We disagree she violated ERs 1.7(a)(2), 3.4(c), and 4.4(a). We reduce her suspension to six months and, as a condition for reinstatement, require her to take ten hours of classes…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In the Matter of Lisa M. AubuchonArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Becket Benedict Hinckley, Wsb 6-3434Wyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- Brittner v. LanzilottaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- In the Matter of Michael E. IslerArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Board of Professional Responsibility v. MoriarityWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.