Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Greene

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1995No. 95-837PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

This disciplinary case presents the court with an opportunity to state a clear test that should be consistently applied in all cases where an officer of the court intentionally misrepresents a crucial fact to the court in order to effect a desired result to benefit a party.

In discipline cases involving deception by an attorney, we have consistently imposed a suspension or a stayed suspension. In Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 369, 613 N.E.2d 178, we held that an assistant prosecuting attorney who failed to disclose to the court and defense counsel the location of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. DziennyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. MotschOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. PommeranzOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. TrumboOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. PapckeOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. BattOhio Supreme Court · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API