Legal Opinion
Butler Mfg. Co. v. Enterprise Cleaning Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 28, 1936No. 10321PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.
This case involves a contest between systems employed in the dry cleaning of textile materials, such as soiled garments and the like. Appellant is the owner of three patents: The Fenton patent, No. 1,-669,235, issued May 8, 1928; the Hatfield patent, No. 1,704,604, issued March 5, 1929; and the Hatfield-Alliott patent, No. 1,728,-343, issued September 17, 1929. It is charged that three claims in each patent are infringed by the process employed by appellee Enterprise Cleaning Company, and recommended by appellee Filtration Products Company. The latter company…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wright v. YuenglingSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Western Willite Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Elliott & Co. v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- Torrey v. HancockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Sloan Filter Co. v. Portland Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Montmarquet v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
- Gustave W. Borkland v. Svend Pedersen and Borghild Pedersen, Etc., D/B/A Paramount Plastics Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- A. E. Staley Manufacturing Co. v. Old Rock Distilling Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1963
- Reed v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.