Legal Opinion

Montmarquet v. Johnson & Johnson

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 4, 1949No. Civ. 9220PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Francis H. Montmarquet, doing-business as The O. C. Manufacturing Company, alleged that defendant, Johnson & Johnson, infringes the plaintiff’s patent No. 2,301,066 for an athletic. supporter (jock strap) issued November 3, 1942. Plaintiff sought the usual injunctive and accounting relief. In answering the defendant denied the validity of the plaintiff’s patent and infringe'ment of the same. It asserted a counterclaim for a declaratory judgment on the ground that the patent is -invalid' and not infringed. Plaintiff’s reply to the counterclaim admitted the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  5. Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. The Borden Company v. Clearfield Cheese Co., Inc., a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  3. Allen-Bradley Company v. Air Reduction CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1973
  5. Messing v. Quiltmaster CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API