Legal Opinion
Gustave W. Borkland v. Svend Pedersen and Borghild Pedersen, Etc., D/B/A Paramount Plastics Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 20, 1957No. 11881_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, owner of patent 2,357,806, issued September 12, 1944 and of 23,171, reissue of 242,338, brought suit against defendants charging infringement of both patents. The district court found them infringed by the process employed by defendants, but invalid. In its opinion, reported in 142 F.Supp. 652, the court explored meticulously and discussed at length the issues of law and fact involved and the evidence submitted, and made extended findings and conclusions, which we need not repeat.
Upon appeal plaintiff insists that the finding of invalidity is clearly…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Concrete Appliances Co. v. GomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Schnading Corporation v. Gaines Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- James C. Hobbs v. Wisconsin Power & Light Company and William Powell CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Griffith Rubber Mills, a Corporation v. Henry S. HoffarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Continental Can CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.