Elliott & Co. v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Suit in' equity by the Youngstown Car Manufacturing Company against Elliott & Co., Reinbold Herman, and Byron K. Elliott. Decree for complainant, and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBALD, District Judge.
The patent in suit is for a blue print machine. As specified in the patent, the device consists in an upright glass cylinder or frame, around which are wrapped the drawing to be copied and the sensitized paper to which it is to be transferred; the two being, icept in intimate contact by a canvass envelope or cover drawn down over them. The printing is done by electric light, and this is supplied by an arc lamp suspended immediately over the open top of the- cylinder, on a cord and pulley, by means of which it is let down into the cylinder to do the printing. As the…
2Cited by29 opinions
- Herman v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Stoody Co. v. Mills Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Coltman v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Himmel Bros. Co. v. Serrick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- International Flatstub Check Book Co. v. Young & Selden Co. of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.