Legal Opinion

Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 9, 2011No. 10-290PublishedCited by 815 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sotomayor

Under § 282 of the Patent Act of 1952, “[a] patent shall be presumed valid” and “[t]he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim thereof shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity.” 35 U. S. C. §282. We consider whether § 282 requires an invalidity defense to be proved by clear and convincing evidence. We hold that it does.

I

A

Pursuant to its authority under the Patent Clause, U. S. Const., Art. I, §8, cl. 8, Congress has charged the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) with the task of examining patent applications, 35 U. S. C. § 2(a)(1), and issu*96ing patents…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by815 opinions

  1. Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  4. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. Berkheimer v. Hp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018

810 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API