Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sotomayor
Under § 282 of the Patent Act of 1952, “[a] patent shall be presumed valid” and “[t]he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim thereof shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity.” 35 U. S. C. §282. We consider whether § 282 requires an invalidity defense to be proved by clear and convincing evidence. We hold that it does.
I
A
Pursuant to its authority under the Patent Clause, U. S. Const., Art. I, §8, cl. 8, Congress has charged the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) with the task of examining patent applications, 35 U. S. C. § 2(a)(1), and issu*96ing patents…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by815 opinions
- Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Berkheimer v. Hp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
810 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.