Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. B & C MacHine Co. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1992No. 1992-0150PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The underlying issue in this appeal is whether the commission had the authority to vacate and reconsider its 1989 order denying additional benefits to Sylvia Holik. For the reasons that follow, we find that the commission had such authority. We further hold that the commission’s January 17, 1990 decision is in accordance with law.

As a threshold matter, we note that appellant essentially concedes that the Summit County Court of Common Pleas did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to address the merits of Sylvia’s R.C. 4123.519 appeal but, nevertheless, contends, citing various cases, that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Weimer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Board of Education v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Saunders v. Metal Container Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Manns v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Nicholls v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Gobich v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State ex rel. Nicholls v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Foster v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Cassens Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API