State ex rel. O.M. Scott & Sons Co. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.
The threshold issue which must be addressed in this cause is whether relator has established the prerequisites essential to the issuance of a writ of mandamus. For the following reasons, we hold that relator has not sustained the burden imposed in mandamus actions, and that the writ must therefore be denied.
It has long been settled that in order for a relator to establish entitlement to the issuance of a writ of mandamus, he must demonstrate: (1) that he has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for; (2) that the respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act; and (3)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Matz v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Felty v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Evans v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Seabloom Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.