Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Admr., Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2012No. 2011-0902PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.

*330{¶ 1} This appeal presents issues regarding the scope of a workers’ compensation appeal in common pleas court pursuant to R.C. 4123.512. Specifically, we must resolve whether in that proceeding to determine a claimant’s right to participate in the workers’ compensation fund, the court is limited to considering those issues that were specifically determined by the Industrial Commission below, or whether the de novo nature of the proceeding obligates the claimant to present and the court to consider all the evidence necessary for determining the claimant’s right to participate.

{¶ 2} For the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. White v. LeimbachOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Oswald v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Jackovic v. WebbOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Daniel v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Daniels v. Northcoast Anesthesia Providers, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. M.S. v. Toth, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ninth District, Medina County2017

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API