United States v. Billy Joe Pinter
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THEIS, District Judge.
This is an appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, the Honorable Frank H. Seay presiding. The issue presented for appeal is whether the district court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence found in an open field. We find no error and therefore affirm.
In February 1989, Defendant/Appellant Billy Joe Pinter and three codefendants were charged in an eleven count indictment with violations of various drug statutes. Pinter was charged in six counts with conspiracy, manufacturing methamphetamine, possession of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Cruz CorralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Jose Manuel BenitezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jose Alfredo PreciadoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- State v. HemphillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- Schroeder v. KochanowskiDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- United States v. Clarence Edward Cody and Pauline W. CodyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Hart v. MyersDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.