Legal Opinion
United States v. Clarence Edward Cody and Pauline W. Cody
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 1, 1993No. 92-7023, 92-7024PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Clarence Edward Cody (“Mr. Cody”) and Pauline W. Cody (“Mrs. Cody”) appeal then-convictions on identical drug charges, and in Mr. Cody’s case, a firearms charge. The Codys contend that agents of the Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics (“OBN”) violated the Fourth Amendment in conducting a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Darrell BeaulieuCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ralph Joseph WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. HardwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Marcos Amabiles PenaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Bobby Gene RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Iris Collette Jackson Dwight Dean JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Laroan F. Verners, United States of America v. Guessinia Verners Also Known as Guessinia HollandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.