Hester v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
The plaintiff in error, Hester, was convicted of concealing distilled spirits &c. under Rev. Stats., § 3296. The case is brought here directly from the District Court on the single ground that by refusing to exclude the testimony of two witnesses and to direct a verdict for the defendant, the plaintiff in error, the Court violated his rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States.
The witnesses wh©se testimony is objected to were revenue officers. In consequence of information they went toward the house of Hester’s-father, where the plaintiff in error…
2Cited by1,147 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
1,142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.