Legal Opinion

Oliver v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 17, 1984No. 82-15PublishedCited by 1,752 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell

The “open fields” doctrine, first enunciated by this Court in Hester v. United States, 265 U. S. 57 (1924), permits police officers to enter and search a field without a warrant. We granted certiorari in these cases to clarify confusion that has arisen as to the continued vitality of the doctrine.

I

No. 82-15.Acting on reports that marihuana was being raised on the farm of petitioner Oliver, two narcotics agents of the Kentucky State Police went to the farm to investigate.1 Arriving at the farm, they drove past petitioner's house to a locked gate with a “No Trespassing” sign. A footpath led…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,752 opinions

  1. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

1,747 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API