Legal Opinion

Stanley W. Smith, Inc. v. Pilgrim

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1931No. Docket No. 6895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The plaintiff and appellant instituted this action against the respondent for the possession of an automobile or for its value. The defendant denied all of the allegations of the complaint and by affirmative answer alleged in himself ownership and the right to possession, praying judgment for the value of the property and damages for its detention by the plaintiff. Upon a trial by jury it developed that the plaintiff had more than three years previously deprived the defendant of his car, and that it had disposed of the same. Under the instructions given by the trial court a verdict and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Meyers v. BradfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Bonestell v. Western Automotive Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Taylor v. BernheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Tucker v. HagertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Steel Motor Service, Inc. v. ZalkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  2. Booth v. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Meyers v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Lowrey v. RegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Harris v. Dixon Cadillac Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API