Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Bernheim
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 1, 1922No. Civ. No. 4093PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, J., pro tem.
In this action judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff Verne W. Taylor for the possession of an automobile, or for the sum of $1,000, the value thereof, in the event possession could not be had, and for the further sum of $400 damages against the defendant J. H. Bernheim, for the wrongful detention of said automobile. The defendant Bernheim has appealed.
There are two persons named Taylor involved in this transaction; the plaintiff, Verne W. Taylor, and his son, Verne J. Taylor, and for convenience they will be hereinafter respectively referred to as Taylor, Sr., and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Knapp v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Boles v. StilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Barkly v. CopelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Richards v. MoreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Tucker v. HagertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Markley v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- McCaffey C. Co., Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- West Coast Life Insurance v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.