Legal Opinion
Bonestell v. Western Automotive Finance Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 20, 1924No. Civ. No. 2796PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Action in claim and delivery for the recovery of a touring automobile and damages for the detention thereof. Plaintiff had judgment for the recovery of the automobile and for the sum of $600 damages. The defendant appeals. The action was originally begun against the appellant herein and Clarence Nuss and George Graham. It was thereafter dismissed as to the defendant Graham and judgment entered only against the corporation.
The respondent makes several preliminary…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bearss v. FordIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Bradbury v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Blodgett v. RheinschildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Mutch v. Long Beach Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
3Cited by24 opinions
- Burr v. Capital Reserve Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Vartanian v. CrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Gem-Valley Ranches, Inc. v. SmallIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. HendleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Washington Lumber & Millwork Co. v. McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.