Tucker v. Hagerty
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Plaintiff brings the action in claim and delivery. In his amended complaint he alleges that defendant is the duly elected, qualified, and acting constable of Sacramento Township, Sacramento County, and that, on the twentieth day of July, 1917, as such constable, defendant wrongfully took possession of a certain automobile under a writ of attachment, in a certain action, pending in said township, wherein Vina Hall is plaintiff and P. A. Smitteamp and Sadie M. Smitteamp are defendants; that, on July 21, 1917, plaintiff “made a verified demand upon said constable for the release of said…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Kelly v. McKibbenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Dorsey v. ManloveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Morris v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Hickey v. Coschina.California Supreme Court · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Guerin v. KirstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Steel Motor Service, Inc. v. ZalkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- Taylor v. BernheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Booth v. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Crawford v. MeadowsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.