Legal Opinion

Harris v. Dixon Cadillac Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1982No. Civ. 63108PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict awarding to respondent Susan Harris $10,000 in general damages and $45,000 in punitive damages for Dixon Cadillac Company’s 1976 violation of the Automotive Repair Act. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 9884.9, requiring a written estimate and an authorization prior to repairing an automobile), and its subsequent detention of respondent’s 1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille.

Appellant does not now dispute the finding that it violated the Automotive Repair Act, but requests reversal because (1) the trial court’s award of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Reynolds v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Kuffel v. Seaside Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Zhadan v. Downtown Los Angeles Motor Distributors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Marriage of VanderbeekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Metz v. SoaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. People v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Teed v. ChenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API