Legal Opinion

Acker v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 13, 1991No. Nos. 213-78C, 399-78C, 76-79C, 266-79C, 580-79C, 57-80C, 137-80C and 543-82CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDEWELT, Judge.

I

In these consolidated civilian pay actions, plaintiffs, teachers presently or formerly employed by the Department of Defense Overseas Dependents School System, seek living quarter allowances and travel agreements to which they allege they were entitled based on their teaching services in foreign areas. In Acker v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 281, 620 F.2d 802 (1980) (Acker I) , the Court of Claims upheld the pertinent regulations which establish conditions for granting such allowances and agreements. The issues remaining involve application of those regulations to the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  3. Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  5. Jewell M. Hart v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hatter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  2. Cherokee Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  3. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  4. Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. Nicholas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API