Nicholas v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
This case stands on defendant’s motion filed September 3,1996 to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction this civil action seeking annuity benefits under the Survivor Benefit Plan applicable to the United States Marine Corps. We conclude that we have subject matter jurisdiction of plaintiffs claims but that on the alternative ground of failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the case should be dismissed in part.
Specifically, we conclude that plaintiff asserts a viable claim for annuity payments accruing within the six years preceding…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corp. of California, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Westlands Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Pierce v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2004
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Toney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999