Legal Opinion
Friedman v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 7, 1962No. 377-60PublishedCited by 323 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge
The plaintiff is the widow and executrix of Dr. Joseph Friedman who served in the Army on active duty as a medical officer from January 9, 1941, to January 30, 1947. She sues for disability retirement pay alleged to have been arbitrarily denied her husband.
During his service Dr. Friedman suffered a number of periods of serious illness and underwent considerable hospitalization. In 1944 — 1946 he had a series of boards to canvass his capacity for continued service, the last of which was a Betiring Board at Walter Beed General Hospital which decided on October 25, 1946, that he was not perma*5nent…
2Cases cited146 opinions
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Harmon v. BruckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by323 opinions
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Saul MacKlin v. Spector Freight Systems, Inc. Saul MacKlin v. Drivers, Chauffeurs and Helpers, Local Union No. 639Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Chambers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
318 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.