Jones v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*40OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge:
Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss portions of plaintiffs’ complaint under RCFC 12(b)(1). Argument on this motion is deemed unnecessary.
On October 14, 2011, plaintiffs filed this class-action complaint, for themselves and others similarly situated, alleging that they are entitled to Sunday premium pay, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. §§ 5544(a) and 5546(a), for work performed on Sundays. The complaint seeks damages dating back to May 26, 2003.
In Fathauer v. United States, 566 F.3d 1352 (Fed.Cir.2009), the Federal Circuit held that, for purposes of section…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Gross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Abrantes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Bowden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.