Legal Opinion
Jewell M. Hart v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 2, 1990No. 90-5007PublishedCited by 171 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUPLANTIER, District Judge.
The United States Claims Court decided that this suit for annuity benefits under the Survivor Benefit Plan, 10 U.S.C. §§ 1447-1455 (1982), filed by a widow more than six years after the death of her military retiree husband, is not barred by the statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2501 (1988), as to benefits which had become due and payable to her within six years prior to her filing suit, on the ground that it is a “continuing” claim. Hart v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 481 (1989). The United States appeals that decision. We reverse.
BACKGROUND
Jewell M. Hart is the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by171 opinions
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Alaska v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Ariadne Financial Services Pty. Ltd. And Memvale Pty. Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.