Legal Opinion
Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 22, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 976PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
On February 13, 1948 this court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that upon the then undisputed facts the action was barred by the Delaware statute of limitations applicable to the action. Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co., D.C., 75 F.Supp. 732.
Plaintiff thereafter filed his notice of appeal and on October 22, 1948 the mandate from .the Court of Appeals was received affirming the judgment of this court. 170 F.2d 146, certiorari denied 336 U.S. 904, 929, 947, 69 S.Ct. 490; 337 U.S. 921, 69 S.Ct. 1152.
Plaintiff on April 28, 1949 filed a motion in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Home Indemnity Co. of New York v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Daniels v. GoldbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Young v. Same.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
- In re Standard Gas & Electric Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Von Wedel v. McGrathDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
- Martinez v. CookNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- MacArthur v. San Juan CountyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2005
- Cooper Agency v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
- Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.