Legal Opinion
Von Wedel v. McGrath
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 2, 1951No. Civ. 11422PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
The original complaint in this case was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, Von Wedel v. Clark, D.C., 84 F.Supp. 299, affirmed Von Wedel v. McGrath, 3 Cir., 180 F.2d 716, certiorari denied 340 U.S. 816, 71 S.Ct. 45. Plaintiff now seeks leave to file an amended complaint upon the grounds that:
“(1) Justice requires that the plaintiff be given an opportunity to correct the original complaint dismissed by order of this Court dated June 14, 1949;
“(2) Plaintiff has only recently been able to verify the additional facts alleged in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Feddersen Motors, Inc. v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Kelly v. Delaware River Joint CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Newbury Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
- Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Mull v. Colt Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Kahle v. Amtorg Trading Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
- Kathleen K. Wilkin v. Sunbeam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.