Legal Opinion
Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 8, 1952No. Civ. A. No. 1381PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This is a motion for summary judgment. A brief summary of the many former stages of this litigation seems to be required. On November 27, 1946, the plaintiff instituted an action against the defendant involving the same facts as now relied upon. On February 27, 1948, this court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the action on the ground that the applicable Delaware Statute of Limitations, Rev.Code 1935, § 5133, barred the action.1 On appeal this judgment was affirmed on October 22, 1948.2 On April 28, 1949, plaintiff moved to set aside the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Samson Crane Co. v. Union Nat. Sales, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949
- Carpenter v. Erie R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- United States v. Cotton Valley Operators CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
- Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Florida Ex Rel. Broward County v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1971
- Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Laurie J. Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953