Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Cook

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1953No. 5632PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGHEE, Justice.

On the former appeal of this case, 1952, 56 N.M. 343, 244 P.2d 134, we affirmed tfee action of the trial court in dismissing the second amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action in certain particulars there stated. The defendants did not secure a judgment dismissing the cause of action following the announcement by the plaintiffs they would stand on their second amended complaint. Absent a judgment, the appeal was necessarily taken under Supreme Court Rule 5, sec. 2, which provides appeals may be taken in all civil actions fronj such interlocutory judgments,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Martinez v. CookNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Von Wedel v. McGrathDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
  4. Young v. Same.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
  5. Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hanberry v. FitzgeraldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Meeker v. WalkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Hambaugh v. PeoplesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. Pennsylvania Transformer Division v. Electric City Supply Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Peoples v. PeoplesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API