Legal Opinion
Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 13, 1948No. Civ. 976PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff, a citizen of New York, against the defendant, a Delaware corporation.
The plaintiff, acting in propria persona and without counsel, has filed the complaint and has personally appeared at the argument of the motion for summary judgment. The complaint is so inartistically drawn that it is difficult to construe it by any known standard. Giving to the lauguage of the complaint every favorable implication, the following would seem to he the general contentions:
It is generally alleged that the defendant manufactured a product having…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Means v. MacFadden Publications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- White v. GovatosSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
- McGrath v. Helena Rubinstein, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
3Cited by10 opinions
- Henis v. Compania Agricola De GuatemalaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1953
- Hartman v. StumboSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- Riley v. Union Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Anthony Natale and Julia Natale, His Wife v. The Upjohn Company and Lakeside Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.