Legal Opinion

E & L Chipping Co. v. Hanover Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided February 5, 1998No. 09-96-232 CVPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOVER, Justice.

This appeal from the granting of summary judgments in favor of St. Paul Insurance Company and Hanover Insurance Companies raises several important issues concerning insurance law and the scope of environmental insurance coverage under Texas law.

Appellants (collectively referred to as “E & L”) are a lumber company (E & L Chipping Co., Inc.) and its owners (the “Lower-ys”). Appellees are three insurance companies: St. Paul Insurance Company (“St. Paul”) and The Hanover Insurance Company and Hanover Lloyd’s Insurance Company (collectively referred to as “Hanover”).

E & L…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Harwell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. CowanTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Northfield Insurance v. Loving Home Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Carolina Casualty Insurance v. SowellDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
  3. Texas Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Southwest Aggregates, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  4. Westport Insurance v. Atchley, Russell, Waldrop & Hlavinka, L.L.P.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
  5. Pilgrim Enterprises, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API