Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance v. Griffin
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is a declaratory judgment action. Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company sought a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify its insured, James Royal III, in a suit brought by Robert Griffin. The trial court granted summary judgment for Farmers. The court of appeals reversed, holding that Farmers has a duty to defend Royal but not to indemnify him. We hold that, under the facts alleged against Royal, Farmers has no duty to defend Royal in the underlying suit. We further hold that Farmers’ duty to indemnify Royal constituted a justiciable controversy properly reached…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bonham State Bank v. BeadleTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. CowanTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- State Farm Life Insurance Co v. BeastonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by345 opinions
- Patterson v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- MBM Financial Corp. v. Woodlands Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- Rocor International, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Lamar Homes, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
340 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.