Legal Opinion

Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. Cowan

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1997No. 95-1160PublishedCited by 408 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCornyn, Justice

We decide in this case the meaning of two terms commonly used in insurance policies. First, we decide whether mental anguish alone is a “bodily injury” under a standard homeowners’ insurance policy defining “bodily injury” as “bodily harm, sickness or disease.” We conclude that, absent an allegation of physical manifestation of mental anguish, a claim of mental anguish is not a “bodily injury” as defined in the policy for purposes of invoking the duty to defend. Second, we decide whether an insured’s intentional tort that results in unintended injuries is an “accident,” and thus an…

2Cases cited102 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by408 opinions

  1. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Utica National Insurance Co. of Texas v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Guideone Elite Insurance Co. v. Fielder Road Baptist ChurchTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. General Mills Restaurants, Inc. v. Texas Wings, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000

403 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API