Legal Opinion

Harwell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1995No. 94-0634PublishedCited by 539 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGonzalez, Justice

In this case we determine whether an insured provided notice of a suit filed against her to her insurance carrier, thereby binding the carrier by the resulting judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the insurer, and the court of appeals affirmed. 876 S.W.2d 494. We hold that the insurer is not bound by the judgment against the insured because the insured faded to comply with the notice of suit provision of the insurance policy. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

I

On December 5,1986, Tammy D. Hubbard and Erie Christopher Leatherman were in an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by539 opinions

  1. Fish v. Tandy Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Morris v. JTM Materials, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. World Help v. Leisure Lifestyles, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Wrenn v. G.A.T.X. Logistics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CrockerTexas Supreme Court · 2008

534 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API