Legal Opinion
Koutny v. Martin
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 31, 2007No. Civil Action 06-598 (RWR)PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Seven plaintiffs sued defendant Carla Martin under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), alleging that Martin deprived them of their constitutional rights to access to the courts and to a fair trial. After the seven cases were consolidated, Martin moved to dismiss the complaint claiming that plaintiffs lack standing and fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. While plaintiffs possess standing to pursue their claims, they have not stated a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Vasser v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Douglass v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Van Ravenswaay v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS v. CheneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Sierra v. HaydenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.