Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Creighton

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 25, 1987No. 85-1520PublishedCited by 12,238 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

The question presented is whether a federal law enforcement officer who participates in a search that violates the Fourth Amendment may be held personally liable for money *637damages if a reasonable officer could have believed that the search comported with the Fourth Amendment.

I

Petitioner Russell Anderson is an agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. On November 11, 1983, Anderson and other state and federal law enforcement officers conducted a warrantless search of the home of respondents, the Creighton family. The search was conducted because Anderson believed that Vadaain Dixon, a man…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12,238 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

12,233 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API