Bowles v. Krasno Bros. Glove & Mitten Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action for treble damages under Sec. 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix § 925(e), alleging violations of General Maximum Price Regulation (7 F.R. 3153) in the sale of work gloves after July 31, 1942.
Defendant delivered work gloves to various customers during March, 1942. Some of the orders on which these deliveries were based were received by defendant during the first part of and up to the 17th of March, 1942. The prices charged were uniform except those sold to Gross and Talcott which were at a higher price. Gross was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zimberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- People v. KeaneNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1944
- Bowles v. Good Luck Glove Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1943
- Bowles v. Good Luck Glove Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bowles v. GoebelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Bowles v. AmmonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- Haber v. GarthlyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Bowles v. WeitzDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Mercado v. BrannanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.