Legal Opinion

People v. Keane

New York City Magistrates' Court

Decided March 30, 1944PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rothenbeeg, C. M.

Defendants move to dismiss the complaints on the following grounds:(1) That the charges, although contained in several complaints, constitute in law and in fact but one infraction and that an acquittal or conviction in one is a bar to the prosecution of the others;(2) That the corporate defendant should have been joined as a party defendant in the same complaint with the individual defendant named;(3) That the clothing of the New York State War Council with the powers enumerated in the legislative Act which established it (L. 1942, ch. 544, as amd.) and the acts pursuant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bowles v. AmmonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
  2. Bowles v. Krasno Bros. Glove & Mitten Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1945
  3. Stein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  4. Bowles v. WeitzDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Bowles v. PecherskyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API