Bowles v. Weitz
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, District Judge.
This is a civil action brought by the Administrator of the Office of Price Administration against the defendant, David Weitz, under and pursuant to the provisions of Sections 2, 4, 205(a) and(c) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix §§ 902, 904, 925 (a, c).
It is the contention of the plaintiff that the defendant violated Maximum Price Regulation No. 394; Office of Economic Stabilization Regulation No. 1, Sections 4002.1 and 4002.4; Revised Ration Order No. 16, Section 6.9, and General Maximum Price Regulation, Section 1499.13, in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Zimberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Bowles v. AmmonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- Bowles v. Krasno Bros. Glove & Mitten Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1945
- Bowles v. GoebelDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Woods v. CorseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Connor v. WheelerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Porter v. JorgensenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1946
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Foust Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.